What Evidence Says about Reading Recovery
In May, 2002, a letter criticizing Reading Recovery was widely
distributed to members of Congress and the education community via
the Internet. This 76-page comprehensive report reviews the research
base for Reading Recovery and responds to the four criticisms of the
Internet letter concerning Reading Recovery effectiveness, costs,
assessment measures, and teaching phonics. A 12-page summary report
is also available.
What Evidence Says About Reading Recovery
(Full Report pdf version)
Executive Summary (Complete 12-Page with Cover)
Executive Summary (without Cover)
Introduction
Section I
Reading Recovery is highly successful with lowest-performing
first-grade students.
Section II
Cost-effectiveness is a complex concept in education.
Section III
Reading Recovery uses standard assessment measures.
Section IV
Change is an integral part of Reading Recovery design.
References
and Appendices
|
